rethinkPeptides Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Natriuretic Peptides in Pericardial Fluid Help Determine Cause of Death at Autopsy

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

Pericardial natriuretic peptide levels at autopsy helped distinguish cardiac from non-cardiac death causes, establishing post-mortem BNP/ANP as forensic markers for cardiac function at time of death.

Key finding

Post-mortem pericardial ANP and BNP levels differentiated cardiac from non-cardiac death causes in medico-legal autopsies, with BNP showing the best d

What the researchers found

Post-mortem pericardial ANP and BNP levels differentiated cardiac from non-cardiac death causes in medico-legal autopsies, with BNP showing the best discrimination — establishing natriuretic peptides as forensic biomarkers for cardiac function assessment at death.

Why it matters

Relevant for natriuretic-peptides, cardiovascular.

How the study worked

cross-sectional study.

What this study cannot tell us

See abstract.

How to read the evidence

moderate evidence.

When this study was published

Published in 2007.

The bigger picture

Advances peptide research.

Questions still open

  • Further research needed.
  • Clinical translation to evaluate.

Common questions

What was studied?
Natriuretic Peptides in Pericardial Fluid Help Determine Cause of Death at Autopsy
What was found?
Pericardial natriuretic peptide levels at autopsy helped distinguish cardiac from non-cardiac death causes, establishing post-mortem BNP/ANP as forensic markers for cardiac function at time of death.

Read the original research

Postmortem pericardial natriuretic peptides as markers of cardiac function in medico-legal autopsies.

International journal of legal medicine, 121(1), 28-35

Citation

Zhu, Bao-Li; Ishikawa, Takaki; Michiue, Tomomi; Li, Dong-Ri; Zhao, Dong; Tanaka, Sayaka; Kamikodai, Yasunobu; Tsuda, Kohei; Okazaki, Shuji; Maeda, Hitoshi. (2007). Postmortem pericardial natriuretic peptides as markers of cardiac function in medico-legal autopsies.. International journal of legal medicine, 121(1), 28-35.