rethinkPeptides Search
Menu
Study breakdown

First Study of Intravenous BPC-157 in Humans Shows No Side Effects in Two Patients

Pilot StudyPreliminary evidence
The takeaway

The first published study of intravenous BPC-157 in humans found no adverse effects in two adults receiving 10–20 mg doses, though the sample is far too small for definitive safety conclusions.

0 adverse effects

Neither participant experienced any side effects from IV BPC-157 at doses up to 20 mg — the first formal safety data for this route of administration in humans, though based on only two people.

What the researchers found

Intravenous BPC-157 at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg was well-tolerated in two healthy adults with no adverse effects. Blood work monitoring showed no measurable effects on heart, liver, kidney, thyroid, or blood glucose biomarkers across the three-day study period.

This is the first published study examining intravenous BPC-157 administration in humans. Both participants had previously received IV BPC-157, and the IRB-approved protocol used escalating doses over two consecutive days.

Why it matters

BPC-157 is one of the most widely discussed peptides in the wellness and biohacking community, yet virtually all published research has been in animals. The near-complete absence of human data has been the elephant in the room. This tiny pilot study from Dr. Edwin Lee — one of very few researchers publishing human BPC-157 data — provides the first formal safety assessment of intravenous administration. While far too small to be definitive, it's a step toward filling the massive evidence gap between animal studies and widespread human use.

The numbers in context

n=2 · 10 mg IV on day 1 · 20 mg IV on day 2 · 250 cc normal saline · 1-hour infusions · 0 adverse effects reported · no changes in heart, liver, kidney, thyroid, or glucose markers

How the study worked

IRB-approved pilot safety study. Two participants had baseline blood work and vital signs recorded, then received 10 mg BPC-157 in 250 cc saline IV over one hour on day 1, followed by 20 mg on day 2. Fasting blood work and vitals were repeated on days 2 and 3. Participants were questioned about side effects at each visit.

Who was studied

2 healthy adults: a 58-year-old Asian male and a 68-year-old Caucasian female, both with prior IV BPC-157 experience

What this study cannot tell us

Extremely small sample (n=2) — essentially an anecdotal safety observation, not a powered study. Both participants had prior IV BPC-157 exposure, so truly naïve reactions weren't captured. Only three days of monitoring — no long-term safety data. Published in an alternative medicine journal, not a high-impact clinical journal. No control group. The doses used may not reflect typical clinical applications.

How to read the evidence

Preliminary evidence: an IRB-approved pilot study that is formally published but limited to 2 participants with no control group. Too small to establish safety definitively, but notable as the first published data on IV BPC-157 in humans.

When this study was published

Published in 2025, this is among the most recent human BPC-157 data available. Given the near-total absence of prior human IV data, even this tiny study fills a significant gap.

The bigger picture

BPC-157 has an enormous gap between its animal research base (hundreds of studies showing healing, anti-inflammatory, and protective effects) and its human evidence (almost none). This pilot study, while tiny, represents a meaningful step because it's IRB-approved, formally published, and specifically tests the safety of intravenous administration — the most aggressive route. Dr. Lee's group is essentially the only team publishing human BPC-157 data, making each study significant by default in a field starving for human evidence.

Questions still open

  • Will larger, controlled studies confirm the safety of IV BPC-157 at these or higher doses?
  • What are the pharmacokinetics of IV BPC-157 — how long does it stay in the body and where does it go?
  • Beyond safety, does IV BPC-157 show measurable therapeutic effects in humans that match the animal data?

Common questions

Is this study enough to prove IV BPC-157 is safe?
No. Two participants over three days is a starting point, not proof. It shows that two people tolerated the treatment without immediate problems, but rare side effects, delayed reactions, and effects in different populations can't be detected with such a tiny sample. The authors themselves emphasize that future larger studies are needed.
Why is this study significant if it only has two participants?
Because it's the first. Despite thousands of people using BPC-157, there was zero published data on intravenous administration in humans before this study. In a field with almost no formal human evidence, even a small IRB-approved pilot study fills an important gap and provides a framework for larger studies to follow.

Read the original research

Safety of Intravenous Infusion of BPC157 in Humans: A Pilot Study.

Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 31(5), 20-24

Citation

Lee, Edwin; Burgess, Kailynd. (2025). Safety of Intravenous Infusion of BPC157 in Humans: A Pilot Study.. Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 31(5), 20-24.