Medication adherence comparison between semaglutide and empagliflozin in T2D found differences in persistence and compliance, informing drug selection for treatment sustainability.
Key findingMedication adherence comparison between semaglutide and empagliflozin in T2D found differences in pe
What the researchers found
Medication adherence comparison between semaglutide and empagliflozin in T2D found differences in persistence and compliance, informing drug selection for treatment sustainability.
Why it matters
These findings have practical implications for the growing number of patients using peptide-based therapies.
The numbers in context
Retrospective study comparing adherence and persistence between semaglutide and empagliflozin using pharmacy dispensing data.
How the study worked
Study methodology detailed in the full publication.
Who was studied
Adults with type 2 diabetes at a military hospital in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
What this study cannot tell us
Study limitations in the full publication.
How to read the evidence
Evidence level based on study design in publication.
When this study was published
Published in 2025.
The bigger picture
This study contributes to the expanding evidence for peptide therapeutics in clinical practice.
Questions still open
- What are the long-term implications?
- How do results compare to other evidence?
- What further research is needed?
Common questions
What does this mean for patients?
How reliable is this?
Read the original research
Medication Adherence to Semaglutide versus Empagliflozin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study in Saudi Arabia.
Patient preference and adherence, 19, 4179-4190
Citation
Ali, Mostafa A S; Amirthalingam, Palanisamy; Alshareef, Hanan; Alqifari, Saleh F; Elsaid Hamdan, Ahmed Mohsen; Alatawi, Olayan; Hakami, Faris Ahmed M; Albalawi, Nader Salem; Aljabri, Ahmed. (2025). Medication Adherence to Semaglutide versus Empagliflozin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study in Saudi Arabia.. Patient preference and adherence, 19, 4179-4190. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S569096