Cyclic Peptide Drugs: A Review of Past Successes, Current State, and Future Potential
Over 40 cyclic peptide drugs are already in clinical use, with new rational design and evolution techniques enabling de novo development of cyclic peptide therapeutics beyond what nature provides.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Over 40 cyclic peptide drugs are currently in clinical use, with approximately one new cyclic peptide drug entering the market annually. While the vast majority of approved cyclic peptides derive from natural products (antimicrobials, human peptide hormones), new techniques based on rational design and in vitro evolution now enable de novo development of cyclic peptide ligands for previously untargetable proteins. Several de novo-designed cyclic peptides are already under clinical evaluation.
Key Numbers
How They Did This
This is a review article surveying the landscape of cyclic peptide therapeutics, examining approved drugs, those in clinical trials, and emerging development techniques including rational design and in vitro evolution approaches.
Why This Research Matters
Cyclic peptides occupy a unique therapeutic space between small molecule drugs and large biologics, combining the best properties of both. The ability to now design them from scratch — rather than relying solely on natural products — dramatically expands their potential to address diseases where no natural peptide solution exists.
The Bigger Picture
The pharmaceutical industry is increasingly looking beyond traditional small molecules and antibodies. Cyclic peptides represent a growing middle ground — they're large enough to bind challenging protein-protein interaction targets but small enough to potentially be orally bioavailable. The shift from natural product discovery to rational design marks a new era for this drug class.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
As a review published in 2017, it does not cover developments from the past several years, a period of rapid advancement in peptide therapeutics. The review focuses on the overview landscape rather than providing detailed clinical efficacy data for individual drugs. The projection of continued growth relies on trends that may be affected by regulatory, manufacturing, or economic factors.
Questions This Raises
- ?Which de novo-designed cyclic peptides mentioned as being in clinical trials have since reached approval?
- ?Can cyclic peptides achieve reliable oral bioavailability, or are they limited to injection-based delivery?
- ?How do manufacturing costs of de novo cyclic peptides compare to conventional small molecule drugs?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 40+ cyclic peptide drugs approved With approximately one new cyclic peptide drug entering the market each year, and de novo design techniques opening entirely new target space
- Evidence Grade:
- This is a narrative review article providing a field overview rather than new experimental data. It offers valuable context for understanding the cyclic peptide drug landscape but does not constitute primary evidence.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2017, this review is now several years old. The cyclic peptide field has advanced considerably since, with new approvals and techniques. However, the foundational overview and historical perspective remain valuable.
- Original Title:
- Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future.
- Published In:
- Current opinion in chemical biology, 38, 24-29 (2017)
- Authors:
- Zorzi, Alessandro, Deyle, Kaycie, Heinis, Christian(2)
- Database ID:
- RPEP-03555
Evidence Hierarchy
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes cyclic peptides good drug candidates?
Cyclic peptides combine high binding affinity, target selectivity, and low toxicity. Their ring structure makes them more stable than linear peptides, and they can target protein interactions that small molecules often cannot reach.
How are new cyclic peptide drugs being developed?
While most approved cyclic peptides come from natural sources, scientists now use rational design and in vitro evolution to create completely new cyclic peptides in the lab. These techniques allow targeting of diseases for which nature provides no peptide solution.
Read More on RethinkPeptides
Related articles coming soon.
Cite This Study
https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-03555APA
Zorzi, Alessandro; Deyle, Kaycie; Heinis, Christian. (2017). Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future.. Current opinion in chemical biology, 38, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006
MLA
Zorzi, Alessandro, et al. "Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future.." Current opinion in chemical biology, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006
RethinkPeptides
RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future." RPEP-03555. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/zorzi-2017-cyclic-peptide-therapeutics-past
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.