rethinkPeptides Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Substance P Neuropeptide Promotes Prostate Cancer by Disrupting Antioxidant Defenses

In VitroPreliminary evidence
The takeaway

Substance P increased oxidative stress in prostate cancer cells by reducing key antioxidant enzymes, while blocking its NK1R receptor with aprepitant reversed these effects.

Aprepitant reverses SP effects

NK1R blockade restored antioxidant enzyme levels and reduced oxidative stress caused by Substance P in prostate cancer cells

What the researchers found

Substance P/NK1R signaling increased ROS and decreased both the expression and activity of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin in PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Aprepitant (NK1R antagonist) reversed all of these effects.

Why it matters

Substance P is elevated in many cancers. Understanding how this neuropeptide disrupts cellular antioxidant defenses reveals a new mechanism of cancer promotion and identifies NK1R blockade as a potential therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer.

The numbers in context

The study measured changes in both expression and activity levels of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin proteins in response to SP/NK1R activation.

How the study worked

In vitro study using PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines. Cells treated with Substance P and/or aprepitant (NK1R antagonist). Measured cell viability (resazurin assay), intracellular ROS levels, and glutaredoxin/thioredoxin expression (qRT-PCR) and activity (commercial kits).

Who was studied

Prostate cancer cell lines treated with Substance P

What this study cannot tell us

In vitro study using established cancer cell lines, which do not replicate the complexity of tumors in the body. Aprepitant concentrations used in cell culture may not match achievable clinical doses. No animal or human data. The specific contribution of this redox mechanism to overall cancer progression is unclear.

How to read the evidence

Preliminary evidence: in vitro cell line study demonstrating a specific mechanism. No animal or human data to confirm clinical relevance.

When this study was published

Published in 2024. Contributes to growing evidence on neuropeptide involvement in cancer biology.

The bigger picture

The nervous system and cancer are increasingly recognized as interconnected. Neuropeptides like Substance P can directly influence tumor biology. This study adds oxidative stress manipulation to the list of ways Substance P promotes cancer, and suggests that repurposing the anti-nausea drug aprepitant — already approved and well-tolerated — could have anti-cancer applications.

Questions still open

  • Does aprepitant reduce prostate cancer growth in animal models through this oxidative stress mechanism?
  • Are Substance P levels elevated in prostate cancer patients, and does this correlate with tumor aggressiveness?
  • Could combining aprepitant with standard prostate cancer treatments enhance their effectiveness?

Common questions

What is Substance P and how does it affect cancer?
Substance P is a neuropeptide best known for transmitting pain signals. It also promotes inflammation and, as this study shows, can increase oxidative stress in cancer cells by suppressing antioxidant enzymes — creating conditions that favor tumor growth.
Could the anti-nausea drug aprepitant help fight cancer?
This cell study suggests aprepitant can counteract Substance P cancer-promoting effects by blocking the NK1R receptor. While intriguing, this is very early research — clinical trials in cancer patients would be needed before aprepitant could be considered for this purpose.

Read the original research

The effect of SP/NK1R on expression and activity of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin proteins in prostate cancer cells.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 397(8), 5875-5882

Citation

Zarei Shandiz, Sara; Assaran Darban, Reza; Javid, Hossein; Ghahremanloo, Atefeh; Hashemy, Seyed Isaac. (2024). The effect of SP/NK1R on expression and activity of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin proteins in prostate cancer cells.. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 397(8), 5875-5882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-02996-x