This review examines how cell-penetrating peptides can enhance protein and peptide delivery across nasal, buccal, sublingual, and oral mucosal barriers, addressing the structural challenges of each route for non-invasive drug delivery.
4 mucosal routes, distinct barriersNasal, buccal, sublingual, and oral mucosa each present unique challenges for CPP-mediated protein delivery, requiring route-specific optimization
What the researchers found
CPPs are a versatile platform for enhancing protein permeation across multiple mucosal barriers, with route-specific optimization needed to address the distinct structural and physicochemical challenges of nasal, buccal, sublingual, and oral mucosa.
Why it matters
Eliminating the need for injections would transform how protein drugs are delivered — improving patient comfort, compliance, and accessibility. CPPs represent one of the most promising approaches to achieve this, and understanding which routes work best for which drugs is critical for advancing the technology.
The numbers in context
Review covers four mucosal routes (nasal, buccal, sublingual, oral) and their distinct barrier properties affecting CPP-mediated delivery.
How the study worked
Comprehensive review examining the structural and physicochemical attributes of nasal, buccal, sublingual, and oral mucosal barriers, recent CPP development for protein delivery across each barrier, and challenges for clinical translation.
Who was studied
Literature review of CPP-mediated mucosal delivery
What this study cannot tell us
Review article — no new experimental data. CPP-mediated delivery faces significant challenges including peptide stability, formulation complexity, dose variability, and the gap between in vitro and in vivo performance. Regulatory pathways for CPP-drug conjugates are still undefined. Safety concerns about chronic mucosal exposure to CPPs are not fully resolved.
How to read the evidence
Moderate evidence as a comprehensive review synthesizing the current state of CPP-mediated transmucosal delivery. Individual studies cited range from in vitro to limited in vivo preclinical data.
When this study was published
Published in 2024, reflecting the current state of a field that has advanced significantly with improved CPP designs and formulation technologies.
The bigger picture
The protein therapeutics market exceeds $300 billion, but nearly all protein drugs require injection. Non-invasive alternatives have been a pharmaceutical holy grail for decades. CPPs address the fundamental problem — getting large molecules across biological barriers — in a modular way that can be adapted to different drugs and delivery routes. Success here would impact millions of patients who currently need regular injections.
Questions still open
- Which mucosal route will prove most practical for CPP-mediated protein delivery in clinical practice?
- Can CPP-drug formulations achieve reproducible dosing comparable to injectable protein therapeutics?
- What is the long-term safety profile of repeated mucosal exposure to cell-penetrating peptides?
Common questions
Why can't protein drugs like insulin just be taken as pills?
What is a cell-penetrating peptide?
Read the original research
Cell-penetrating peptides for transmucosal delivery of proteins.
Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 366, 864-878
Citation
Wu, Jiamin; Roesger, Sophie; Jones, Natalie; Hu, Che-Ming J; Li, Shyh-Dar. (2024). Cell-penetrating peptides for transmucosal delivery of proteins.. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 366, 864-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.01.038