Cathelicidins in inflammation and tissue repair: Potential therapeutic applications for gastrointestinal disorders.

Wu, William Ka Kei et al.·Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2010·
RPEP-017102010RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Cathelicidins in inflammation and tissue repair: Potential therapeutic applications for gastrointestinal disorders.
Published In:
Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 31(9), 1118-22 (2010)
Database ID:
RPEP-01710

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-01710·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-01710

APA

Wu, William Ka Kei; Wong, Clover Ching Man; Li, Zhi Jie; Zhang, Lin; Ren, Shun Xiang; Cho, Chi Hin. (2010). Cathelicidins in inflammation and tissue repair: Potential therapeutic applications for gastrointestinal disorders.. Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 31(9), 1118-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2010.117

MLA

Wu, William Ka Kei, et al. "Cathelicidins in inflammation and tissue repair: Potential therapeutic applications for gastrointestinal disorders.." Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2010.117

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Cathelicidins in inflammation and tissue repair: Potential t..." RPEP-01710. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/wu-2010-cathelicidins-in-inflammation-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.