Wound healing mechanism of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin-DM.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Cathelicidin-DM accelerated skin wound healing in mice and promoted cell proliferation and migration.
Key Numbers
How They Did This
The study involved in vitro tests on skin cells and a mouse model to assess the effects of cathelicidin-DM on wound healing.
Why This Research Matters
With rising antibiotic resistance, finding new treatments for chronic wounds is crucial. Cathelicidin-DM could offer a novel approach to enhance healing.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
The study was conducted in mice, and results may not directly translate to humans. Further clinical studies are needed.
Trust & Context
- Original Title:
- Wound healing mechanism of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin-DM.
- Published In:
- Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 10, 977159 (2022)
- Authors:
- Wang, Guixi, Chen, Zhizhi(2), Tian, Pan, Han, Qinqin, Zhang, Jinyang, Zhang, A-Mei, Song, Yuzhu
- Database ID:
- RPEP-06574
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkPeptides
Related articles coming soon.
Cite This Study
https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-06574APA
Wang, Guixi; Chen, Zhizhi; Tian, Pan; Han, Qinqin; Zhang, Jinyang; Zhang, A-Mei; Song, Yuzhu. (2022). Wound healing mechanism of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin-DM.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 10, 977159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.977159
MLA
Wang, Guixi, et al. "Wound healing mechanism of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin-DM.." Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.977159
RethinkPeptides
RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Wound healing mechanism of antimicrobial peptide cathelicidi..." RPEP-06574. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/wang-2022-wound-healing-mechanism-of
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.