Reassessing cancer risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a comprehensive meta-analysis of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Wali, Adil Farooq et al.·Frontiers in pharmacology·2026·
RPEP-163352026RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Reassessing cancer risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a comprehensive meta-analysis of gastrointestinal malignancies.
Published In:
Frontiers in pharmacology, 17, 1736380 (2026)
Database ID:
RPEP-16335

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-16335·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-16335

APA

Wali, Adil Farooq; Rangraze, Imran; Khan, Shehla; Mufti, Uwais Bashir; El-Tanani, Mohamed; Rizzo, Manfredi. (2026). Reassessing cancer risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a comprehensive meta-analysis of gastrointestinal malignancies.. Frontiers in pharmacology, 17, 1736380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1736380

MLA

Wali, Adil Farooq, et al. "Reassessing cancer risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a comprehensive meta-analysis of gastrointestinal malignancies.." Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1736380

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Reassessing cancer risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a comp..." RPEP-16335. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/wali-2026-reassessing-cancer-risk-with

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.