How Anti-CGRP Drugs Went from Lab Discovery to the First FDA-Approved Migraine Treatment

This review chronicles how targeting the peptide CGRP led to a new class of migraine drugs, culminating in erenumab becoming the first FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention in 2018.

Tepper, Stewart J·Headache·2018·Strong EvidenceReview
RPEP-03943ReviewStrong Evidence2018RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Review
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
Review covering clinical trial populations with episodic and chronic migraine, and episodic cluster headache
Participants
Review covering clinical trial populations with episodic and chronic migraine, and episodic cluster headache

What This Study Found

This comprehensive review traces the development of anti-CGRP therapies from the first proof-of-concept with olcegepant in 2004 to the FDA approval of erenumab in May 2018 — the first monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention. It summarizes randomized controlled trial data for four anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab) and two small-molecule gepants (ubrogepant, rimegepant) for acute migraine treatment.

Galcanezumab also showed effectiveness in preventing episodic cluster headache, expanding the potential uses of this drug class beyond migraine.

Key Numbers

Erenumab FDA approved: May 17, 2018 · 4 monoclonal antibodies in development · 2 gepants completed pivotal trials · First gepant proof-of-concept: 2004

How They Did This

Narrative review of the translational research pathway, pathophysiology, and all accessible randomized controlled trials, abstracts, platform presentations, and press releases on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants through May 2018.

Why This Research Matters

For decades, migraine patients relied on medications that were developed for other conditions (blood pressure drugs, antidepressants, anti-seizure drugs). Anti-CGRP therapies were the first treatments designed specifically for migraine based on understanding the biology of the disease. This review captures the moment that era began.

The Bigger Picture

Anti-CGRP therapies represent one of the clearest success stories in translational peptide research — taking a basic science discovery about a neuropeptide's role in pain and turning it into an entirely new drug class. Since this review was published, all four antibodies and both gepants have been approved, and newer CGRP-targeting drugs continue to emerge. This class has fundamentally changed how migraine is treated.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Written in May 2018, this review captures only the earliest clinical data. Several of the drugs discussed were still awaiting FDA decisions at the time of publication. Long-term safety and real-world effectiveness data were not yet available. As a single-author narrative review, it does not use systematic review methodology.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What are the long-term effects of chronically blocking CGRP, given that the peptide plays roles beyond pain signaling?
  • ?Will anti-CGRP therapies prove effective for other headache disorders beyond migraine and cluster headache?
  • ?How do the injectable antibodies compare to the oral gepants in terms of patient preference and adherence?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
First-in-class approval: May 2018 Erenumab (Aimovig) became the first monoclonal antibody approved by the FDA for migraine prevention, opening a new therapeutic era
Evidence Grade:
Rated strong because this review synthesizes data from multiple randomized controlled trials across several anti-CGRP drugs, covering both the mechanistic rationale and clinical evidence that led to FDA approval.
Study Age:
Published in 2018, this review captures the pivotal moment when anti-CGRP drugs were first reaching the market. Since then, all drugs discussed have been approved and extensive real-world data has accumulated, but this remains a valuable historical and scientific reference.
Original Title:
History and Review of anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Therapies: From Translational Research to Treatment.
Published In:
Headache, 58 Suppl 3, 238-275 (2018)
Authors:
Tepper, Stewart J(2)
Database ID:
RPEP-03943

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research on a topic.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CGRP and why does blocking it help migraines?

CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) is a signaling molecule released during migraines that dilates blood vessels and transmits pain signals. Blocking CGRP or its receptor prevents these actions, reducing both the frequency and severity of migraine attacks. This was proven through decades of translational research before anti-CGRP drugs reached patients.

What's the difference between anti-CGRP antibodies and gepants?

Anti-CGRP antibodies (like erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) are injectable drugs given monthly or quarterly for migraine prevention. Gepants (like ubrogepant, rimegepant) are oral pills that can treat individual migraine attacks as they occur. Both target the CGRP pathway but serve different clinical roles.

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Cite This Study

RPEP-03943·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-03943

APA

Tepper, Stewart J. (2018). History and Review of anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Therapies: From Translational Research to Treatment.. Headache, 58 Suppl 3, 238-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13379

MLA

Tepper, Stewart J. "History and Review of anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Therapies: From Translational Research to Treatment.." Headache, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13379

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "History and Review of anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (..." RPEP-03943. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/tepper-2018-history-and-review-of

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.