Meta-analysis of 25 studies (109,846 patients) shows GLP-1 drugs reduce MI (RR 0.86, NNT 207), CV mortality (RR 0.87, NNT 170), MACE (RR 0.87, NNT 67), and stroke (RR 0.88, NNT 335), with greater MI benefit in higher BMI patients.
NNT 67 to prevent one MACEThe most comprehensive GLP-1 cardiovascular meta-analysis translates risk ratios into actionable NNTs: treat 67 patients for 3.5 years to prevent one major cardiovascular event
What the researchers found
MI: RR 0.86 (p<0.01), NNT 207. CV mortality: RR 0.87 (p<0.01), NNT 170. MACE: RR 0.87 (p<0.01), NNT 67. Stroke: RR 0.88 (p<0.01), NNT 335. Higher BMI → greater MI reduction (β=-0.09, p=0.03). GI AEs: RR 1.55, NNTH 9. 25 studies, 109,846 patients, 3.48 years.
Why it matters
NNT values make abstract risk ratios clinically actionable: treating 67 patients for 3.5 years prevents one MACE event, 170 prevents one CV death, 207 prevents one MI. These numbers help prescribers and patients weigh benefits versus costs.
How the study worked
Pairwise meta-analysis of 25 unique RCTs from Medline/Embase. Random-effects model. Primary: MI. Secondary: individual ASCVD components. Meta-regression for BMI. NNT/NNTH calculated.
What this study cannot tell us
Pooled different GLP-1 drugs. Follow-up duration varied. NNT depends on baseline risk. GI side effects common (NNTH 9) but mostly mild.
How to read the evidence
Meta-analysis of 25 RCTs with 109,846 patients. Highest quality cardiovascular evidence available for GLP-1 drugs.
When this study was published
Published in 2025; studies through May 2025.
The bigger picture
This is the definitive GLP-1 cardiovascular meta-analysis: large, comprehensive, with NNT values for clinical decision-making. It confirms GLP-1 drugs are one of the most impactful cardiovascular interventions in modern medicine.
Questions still open
- Are NNTs comparable to statin cardiovascular NNTs?
- Does BMI-dependent MI benefit support preferential use in heavier patients?
- Would longer follow-up lower the NNT further?
Common questions
How effective are GLP-1 drugs at preventing heart attacks?
What are the downsides of GLP-1 drugs for heart protection?
Read the original research
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of number needed to treat, efficacy and safety.
Cardiovascular diabetology, 24(1), 285
Citation
Tang, Ansel Shao Pin; Hsu, Jovan Teng Yuan; Chong, Sheena Kar Shuan; Quek, Jingxuan; Shek, Genevieve; Sulaimi, Farisah; Chan, Kai En; Anand, Vickram Vijay; Chong, Bryan; Mehta, Anurag; Toh, Sue-Anne; Muthiah, Mark; Dimitriadis, Georgios K; le Roux, Carel W; Chan, Mark Yan-Yee; Mamas, Mamas Andreas; Chin, Yip Han; Chew, Nicholas W S. (2025). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of number needed to treat, efficacy and safety.. Cardiovascular diabetology, 24(1), 285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02840-3