Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors: Relevance for basic and clinical studies of the brain and periphery.

Song, Zhimin et al.·Frontiers in neuroendocrinology·2018·
RPEP-039142018RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors: Relevance for basic and clinical studies of the brain and periphery.
Published In:
Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 51, 14-24 (2018)
Database ID:
RPEP-03914

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-03914·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-03914

APA

Song, Zhimin; Albers, H Elliott. (2018). Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors: Relevance for basic and clinical studies of the brain and periphery.. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 51, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.10.004

MLA

Song, Zhimin, et al. "Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors: Relevance for basic and clinical studies of the brain and periphery.." Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.10.004

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors..." RPEP-03914. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/song-2018-crosstalk-among-oxytocin-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.