A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Key Numbers
How They Did This
Why This Research Matters
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Trust & Context
- Original Title:
- A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.
- Published In:
- Pediatrics, 115(4), 1030-8 (2005)
- Authors:
- Sinha, Sunil K, Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry, Valls i Soler, Adolf, Wiswell, Thomas E, Gadzinowski, Janusz, Hajdu, Julia, Bernstein, Graham, Sanchez-Luna, Manuel, Segal, Robert, Schaber, Christopher J, Massaro, Joseph, d'Agostino, Ralph
- Database ID:
- RPEP-01086
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkPeptides
Related articles coming soon.
Cite This Study
https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-01086APA
Sinha, Sunil K; Lacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry; Valls i Soler, Adolf; Wiswell, Thomas E; Gadzinowski, Janusz; Hajdu, Julia; Bernstein, Graham; Sanchez-Luna, Manuel; Segal, Robert; Schaber, Christopher J; Massaro, Joseph; d'Agostino, Ralph. (2005). A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.. Pediatrics, 115(4), 1030-8.
MLA
Sinha, Sunil K, et al. "A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.." Pediatrics, 2005.
RethinkPeptides
RethinkPeptides Research Database. "A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant v..." RPEP-01086. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/sinha-2005-a-multicenter-randomized-controlled
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.