In 68 Japanese migraine patients who had failed oral preventives, CGRP-targeted antibodies cut monthly migraine days nearly in half and an early positive response strongly predicted continued success.
13.4 → 7.4 monthly migraine daysAfter 3 doses of CGRP antibody in Japanese patients who had failed oral preventives
What the researchers found
CGRP mAbs reduced monthly migraine days from 13.4 to 7.4 (p<0.0001) with a 50% response rate, and early response after 1-2 doses predicted sustained benefit at 3 doses (OR: 3.474, p=0.047).
Why it matters
Real-world data confirming CGRP antibody effectiveness in Japanese patients fills an important gap, since genetic and physiological differences can affect drug response across populations. The finding that early response predicts outcomes helps clinicians decide sooner whether to continue treatment.
The numbers in context
Three drugs evaluated: galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab at two Japanese headache centers.
How the study worked
Retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers. 68 patients who failed ≥1 oral preventive received galcanezumab, fremanezumab, or erenumab. Primary endpoints: change in monthly migraine days and HIT-6 score after 3 dosing intervals.
Who was studied
Japanese migraine patients at two headache centers
What this study cannot tell us
Retrospective design with no control group. Relatively small sample (n=68). Single ethnicity (Japanese). Combined three different CGRP antibodies in one analysis. Short follow-up period (3 dosing intervals).
How to read the evidence
Moderate evidence from a real-world observational cohort. Consistent with RCT findings but limited by retrospective design and lack of control group.
When this study was published
Published in 2024. Adds Japanese real-world data to the growing global evidence base for CGRP antibodies.
The bigger picture
CGRP antibodies represent the first migraine-specific preventive therapy class. Confirming their effectiveness across diverse populations and in real-world settings (not just controlled trials) strengthens the evidence base. The early-response predictor finding has practical value for optimizing treatment decisions.
Questions still open
- Are there differences in efficacy between galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab specifically in Japanese patients?
- What predicts non-response to CGRP antibodies, and can these patients benefit from switching within the class?
- How do long-term outcomes beyond 3 doses compare between early and late responders?
Common questions
What are CGRP antibodies and how do they prevent migraines?
How quickly can you tell if a CGRP antibody is working?
Read the original research
Real-world experience with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted antibodies for migraine prevention: a retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers.
BMC neurology, 24(1), 32
Citation
Shibata, Mamoru; Fujita, Kazuki; Hoshino, Eri; Minami, Kazushi; Koizumi, Kenzo; Okada, Satoshi; Sakai, Fumihiko. (2024). Real-world experience with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted antibodies for migraine prevention: a retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers.. BMC neurology, 24(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03521-y