Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Rosetta based methods.

Sarmeili, Faraz et al.·Methods in enzymology·2025·low (review of computational methods)methodology review
RPEP-13427Methodology reviewlow (review of computational methods)2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
methodology review
Evidence
low (review of computational methods)
Sample
N=N/A (methodology review)
Participants
N/A (review of computational peptide design methods)

What This Study Found

Machine learning and Rosetta-based computational methods can now design cyclic peptides that target flat protein surfaces considered undruggable by small molecules.

Key Numbers

Macrocyclic peptides target flat/intracellular undruggable surfaces; enhanced proteolytic stability; non-canonical amino acids incorporated; Rosetta and ML-based design methods reviewed

How They Did This

Review of computational algorithms including Rosetta-based methods, machine learning approaches, and experimental validation strategies for cyclic peptide design.

Why This Research Matters

Cyclic peptides bridge the gap between small drugs and antibodies. Better design tools could accelerate development of drugs for currently untreatable diseases.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Methodology review focused on computational approaches. Many designed peptides still need experimental validation. Computational predictions do not always match in vitro activity.

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Rosetta based methods.
Published In:
Methods in enzymology, 723, 455-476 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-13427

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Cite This Study

RPEP-13427·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-13427

APA

Sarmeili, Faraz; Siegler, Hannah; Powers, Andrew C; Hosseinzadeh, Parisa. (2025). Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Rosetta based methods.. Methods in enzymology, 723, 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2025.09.016

MLA

Sarmeili, Faraz, et al. "Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Rosetta based methods.." Methods in enzymology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2025.09.016

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Roset..." RPEP-13427. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/sarmeili-2025-computational-cyclic-peptide-design

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.