More Osteoporosis Patients Gained Bone on Abaloparatide Than on Teriparatide or Placebo

The bone-building peptide abaloparatide produced meaningful bone density gains in 44.5% of osteoporosis patients at 18 months, versus 32.0% for teriparatide and 1.9% for placebo.

Miller, P D et al.·Bone·2019·Strong EvidenceRandomized Controlled Trial
RPEP-04372Randomized Controlled TrialStrong Evidence2019RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (ACTIVE phase 3 trial)
Participants
Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture (ACTIVE phase 3 trial)

What This Study Found

In the ACTIVE phase 3 trial, the peptide drug abaloparatide produced significantly higher bone mineral density (BMD) response rates than both placebo and teriparatide at all time points and thresholds measured.

At 18 months, 44.5% of abaloparatide patients achieved >3% BMD gains at all three skeletal sites (total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine) compared to just 32.0% for teriparatide and 1.9% for placebo. The superiority was evident as early as 6 months: 19.1% of abaloparatide patients were responders versus 6.5% for teriparatide and 0.9% for placebo. Results were consistent across the >0%, >3%, and >6% response thresholds.

Key Numbers

18-month phase 3 trial · >3% BMD responders at 18 months: abaloparatide 44.5% vs teriparatide 32.0% vs placebo 1.9% · At 6 months: 19.1% vs 6.5% vs 0.9% · Measured at total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine

How They Did This

Prospective, exploratory responder analysis from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial (NCT01343004). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to abaloparatide, teriparatide, or placebo for 18 months. BMD was measured at total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months. Responders were defined as patients achieving BMD gains at all three sites simultaneously.

Why This Research Matters

For postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis, not just average bone density gain matters — what matters is what proportion of patients actually respond well to treatment. This analysis shows that abaloparatide produces meaningful bone density improvement in a larger proportion of patients than teriparatide (the existing peptide standard). Since abaloparatide is a 34-amino-acid peptide that selectively targets a specific conformation of the PTH receptor, it represents a next-generation peptide approach to bone building.

The Bigger Picture

Abaloparatide and teriparatide are both peptide drugs that build bone by activating the PTH1 receptor, but abaloparatide does so by preferentially binding a specific receptor conformation (RG) that promotes bone building over bone resorption. This responder analysis supports abaloparatide's clinical edge and helps clinicians choose between the two available bone-building peptide options for high-risk osteoporosis patients.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

This is an exploratory (not pre-specified primary) analysis of the ACTIVE trial. The responder definition requiring gains at all three sites is stringent and may not reflect clinical significance at individual sites. The trial was industry-sponsored (Radius Health, maker of abaloparatide). The study enrolled only postmenopausal women, so results may not generalize to men or premenopausal osteoporosis.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Does abaloparatide's higher BMD response rate translate to a greater fracture reduction advantage over teriparatide in longer follow-up?
  • ?Would sequential therapy (abaloparatide followed by an antiresorptive) lock in the BMD gains better than teriparatide sequences?
  • ?Can the RG receptor conformation selectivity of abaloparatide be further optimized in next-generation peptide analogs?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
44.5% vs 32.0% Proportion of patients achieving >3% BMD gains at all three skeletal sites after 18 months — abaloparatide vs teriparatide
Evidence Grade:
This is an exploratory analysis from a well-designed phase 3 randomized trial comparing two active treatments and placebo. Strong underlying data, though the responder analysis itself was not the pre-specified primary endpoint.
Study Age:
Published in 2019. Abaloparatide (brand name Tymlos) has been FDA-approved since 2017 and continues to be used clinically. This responder analysis remains relevant for clinical decision-making between abaloparatide and teriparatide.
Original Title:
Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial.
Published In:
Bone, 120, 137-140 (2019)
Database ID:
RPEP-04372

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled TrialGold standard for testing treatments
This study
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups to test cause and effect.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between abaloparatide and teriparatide?

Both are injectable peptide drugs that build new bone by activating the same receptor (PTH1R). Teriparatide (Forteo) is a fragment of natural parathyroid hormone. Abaloparatide (Tymlos) is a synthetic peptide designed to preferentially activate the receptor in a way that maximizes bone building while minimizing bone resorption and calcium elevation. This study shows abaloparatide produces bone density gains in more patients.

Why is it important to gain bone density at all three sites?

Fractures from osteoporosis commonly occur at the spine, hip, and wrist — all areas where bone density matters. Gaining bone at just one site while losing it at others wouldn't provide full protection. This study's strict definition of 'responder' (gains at hip, femoral neck, AND spine simultaneously) ensures the results reflect comprehensive skeletal improvement.

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Cite This Study

RPEP-04372·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-04372

APA

Miller, P D; Hattersley, G; Lau, E; Fitzpatrick, L A; Harris, A G; Williams, G C; Hu, M-Y; Riis, B J; Russo, L; Christiansen, C. (2019). Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial.. Bone, 120, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.10.015

MLA

Miller, P D, et al. "Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial.." Bone, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.10.015

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients ..." RPEP-04372. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/miller-2019-bone-mineral-density-response

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.