Network meta-analysis of anti-CGRP migraine drugs found fremanezumab 900mg most effective at 6 weeks for both chronic and episodic migraine, while erenumab 140mg was most effective at 8 and 12 weeks.
Timing matters for drug choiceFremanezumab worked fastest (best at 6 weeks) but erenumab provided superior sustained effect (best at 8-12 weeks) — drug choice may depend on how quickly relief is needed
What the researchers found
At 6 weeks: fremanezumab 900mg most effective (SMD=-0.55). At 8 weeks: erenumab 140mg most effective (SMD=-0.51). At 12 weeks: erenumab 140mg most effective (SMD=-0.48). For chronic migraine: fremanezumab 900mg best at 6 weeks, erenumab 140mg best at 8 and 12 weeks.
Why it matters
Choosing between four similar drugs is difficult without comparative data. This NMA provides evidence-based rankings by timepoint and migraine type, enabling more informed prescribing decisions.
The numbers in context
6wk: fremanezumab 900mg SMD -0.55; 8wk: erenumab 140mg SMD -0.51; 12wk: erenumab 140mg SMD -0.48; drugs: erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab
How the study worked
Systematic review and network meta-analysis. SCOPUS, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase through January 2019. RCTs of erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab vs placebo. Efficacy at 6, 8, and 12 weeks. Episodic and chronic migraine analyzed separately and combined.
Who was studied
Episodic and chronic migraine patients from randomized controlled trials
What this study cannot tell us
NMA relies on indirect comparisons. Head-to-head trials between anti-CGRP drugs are limited. Effect sizes are modest. Long-term (>12 week) comparisons not assessed. Dose comparisons limited.
How to read the evidence
Moderate-to-high evidence: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, though indirect comparisons between drugs have inherent limitations.
When this study was published
Published 2021. Data through January 2019. Additional clinical experience has accumulated since, though relative rankings may remain similar.
The bigger picture
As more anti-CGRP drugs compete, comparative effectiveness research becomes essential. This NMA shows that drug ranking depends on the timeframe — suggesting that patient expectations should be set accordingly.
Questions still open
- Would fremanezumab maintain its advantage with continued quarterly dosing beyond 6 weeks?
- Why does the relative efficacy ranking change over time?
- Should drug choice be based on expected treatment duration?
Common questions
Which anti-CGRP migraine drug is best?
Should I switch if my anti-CGRP drug isn't working at first?
Read the original research
Efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor blockers in reducing the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs): A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal of the neurological sciences, 427, 117505
Citation
Masoud, Ahmed Taher; Hasan, Mohammed Tarek; Sayed, Ahmed; Edward, Harvey Nabil; Amer, Ahmed Mohamed; Naga, Abdelrahman Elshahat; Elfil, Mohamed; Alghamdi, Badrah S; Perveen, Asma; Ashraf, Ghulam Md; Bahbah, Eshak I. (2021). Efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor blockers in reducing the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs): A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Journal of the neurological sciences, 427, 117505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117505