First evidence of efficacy of peptides targeting the pUL56-pUL89 interaction domain of the human cytomegalovirus terminase complex.

Mafi, Sarah et al.·Antiviral research·2025·
RPEP-123892025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
First evidence of efficacy of peptides targeting the pUL56-pUL89 interaction domain of the human cytomegalovirus terminase complex.
Published In:
Antiviral research, 242, 106259 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-12389

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-12389·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-12389

APA

Mafi, Sarah; Poyet, Jean-Luc; Alain, Sophie; Ligat, Gaëtan; Hantz, Sébastien. (2025). First evidence of efficacy of peptides targeting the pUL56-pUL89 interaction domain of the human cytomegalovirus terminase complex.. Antiviral research, 242, 106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2025.106259

MLA

Mafi, Sarah, et al. "First evidence of efficacy of peptides targeting the pUL56-pUL89 interaction domain of the human cytomegalovirus terminase complex.." Antiviral research, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2025.106259

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "First evidence of efficacy of peptides targeting the pUL56-p..." RPEP-12389. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/mafi-2025-first-evidence-of-efficacy

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.