A 41-year-old woman with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor initially misdiagnosed as thyroid cancer achieved a partial response to 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with no side effects.
Partial response, zero side effects4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE over 8 months produced a partial response with no reported toxicity in a patient with widespread metastatic disease
What the researchers found
A 41-year-old female underwent thyroidectomy for suspected medullary thyroid cancer, but pathology revealed a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of unknown primary origin metastatic to the thyroid.
68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT identified somatostatin receptor-expressing lesions in: liver, right cervical nodes, thoracic paravertebral soft tissue, precoccygeal soft tissue, and right acetabulum (bone).
Disease progressed on octreotide injections. The patient received 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera) PRRT over 8 months with:
- No side effects or toxicities reported
- Partial treatment response on early post-treatment scan at 6 weeks
Key diagnostic lesson: somatostatin receptor PET imaging both identifies the full extent of neuroendocrine disease and predicts response to PRRT, regardless of the organ of origin.
Why it matters
This case illustrates two important concepts: first, that neuroendocrine tumors can mimic other cancers (initially thought to be thyroid cancer), making correct diagnosis critical for proper treatment. Second, that peptide-based imaging (68Ga-DOTATATE PET) and therapy (177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT) form a powerful 'theranostic' pair — the same peptide used for diagnosis also delivers therapy. If a tumor lights up on the diagnostic scan, it's likely to respond to the therapeutic version.
How the study worked
This is a single-patient case report documenting the clinical course of a 41-year-old female with metastatic NET of unknown primary. Diagnosis involved thyroid biopsy, thyroidectomy, and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging. Treatment included octreotide injections (which failed) followed by 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. Response was assessed by post-treatment imaging at 6 weeks.
What this study cannot tell us
This is a single case report — the lowest level of clinical evidence. The partial response at 6 weeks is early and long-term outcomes are unknown. NETs of unknown primary are heterogeneous, and this patient's response may not generalize. The claim of 'no side effects' over 8 months, while encouraging, differs from larger clinical trials showing that PRRT commonly causes some hematologic toxicity. No comparison to other treatment options was possible.
How to read the evidence
Single case report providing the lowest level of clinical evidence. While the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes are favorable, no generalizable conclusions can be drawn. The case is most valuable as a teaching example of theranostic peptide medicine and the importance of accurate NET diagnosis.
When this study was published
Published in 2023, this case reflects the current standard of care for somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors, where 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT has been FDA-approved since 2018.
The bigger picture
The theranostic approach — using the same molecule for both diagnosis and therapy — is one of the most exciting developments in nuclear medicine. DOTATATE-based theranostics (68Ga for imaging, 177Lu for therapy) have transformed neuroendocrine tumor management. This case extends the paradigm by showing that even when the primary tumor site is unknown, somatostatin receptor expression on PET imaging can guide treatment decisions and predict therapy response. Similar theranostic pairs are being developed for prostate cancer (PSMA-targeted) and other malignancies.
Questions still open
- Will this patient's partial response deepen into a complete response, or is additional treatment needed?
- Could earlier initiation of PRRT (before octreotide failure) have produced better outcomes in this case?
- How often do neuroendocrine tumors first present as thyroid metastases, and how many are initially misdiagnosed?
Common questions
What is the theranostic approach used in this case?
Why was this tumor initially thought to be thyroid cancer?
Read the original research
Neuroendocrine metastasis to the thyroid from unknown primary and extrathyroidal disease response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
Radiology case reports, 18(11), 3945-3948
Citation
Khessib, Tasnim; Khessib, Samy; Berry, Gerald; Aparici, Mari. (2023). Neuroendocrine metastasis to the thyroid from unknown primary and extrathyroidal disease response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.. Radiology case reports, 18(11), 3945-3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.07.044