rethinkPeptides Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Fast vs Slow Fat Digestion: Same Fullness But Different Fat Absorption and Metabolism

evidence
The takeaway

Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions produced equal satiety but different triglyceride absorption and metabolic responses — the speed of fat digestion affects metabolism without changing appetite.

Key finding

Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions produced equal satiety but different triglyceride absorption and metabolic responses — the speed of fat dige

What the researchers found

Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions produced equal satiety but different triglyceride absorption and metabolic responses — the speed of fat digestion affects metabolism without changing appetite.

Why it matters

Relevant for peptide research.

How the study worked

research study.

What this study cannot tell us

See abstract.

How to read the evidence

emerging evidence.

When this study was published

Published in 2011.

The bigger picture

Advances peptide research.

Questions still open

  • Further research needed.

Common questions

What was studied?
Fast vs Slow Fat Digestion: Same Fullness But Different Fat Absorption and Metabolism
What was found?
Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions produced equal satiety but different triglyceride absorption and metabolic responses — the speed of fat digestion affects metabolism without changing appetite.

Read the original research

Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions are equally satiating but their triglycerides are differentially absorbed and metabolized in humans.

The Journal of nutrition, 141(5), 809-15

Citation

Keogh, Jennifer B; Wooster, Tim J; Golding, Matthew; Day, Li; Otto, Bärbel; Clifton, Peter M. (2011). Slowly and rapidly digested fat emulsions are equally satiating but their triglycerides are differentially absorbed and metabolized in humans.. The Journal of nutrition, 141(5), 809-15. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.131110