Investigating nutrient intake during use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: a cross-sectional study.

Johnson, Brittany et al.·Frontiers in nutrition·2025·
RPEP-116382025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Investigating nutrient intake during use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: a cross-sectional study.
Published In:
Frontiers in nutrition, 12, 1566498 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-11638

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-11638·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-11638

APA

Johnson, Brittany; Milstead, Mary; Thomas, Olena; McGlasson, Tyler; Green, Lauren; Kreider, Rachel; Jones, Rachel. (2025). Investigating nutrient intake during use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: a cross-sectional study.. Frontiers in nutrition, 12, 1566498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1566498

MLA

Johnson, Brittany, et al. "Investigating nutrient intake during use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: a cross-sectional study.." Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1566498

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Investigating nutrient intake during use of glucagon-like pe..." RPEP-11638. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/johnson-2025-investigating-nutrient-intake-during

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.