Semaglutide and Liraglutide Linked to Higher-Than-Expected Rates of Gallbladder and Biliary Problems

FDA adverse event data revealed that semaglutide and liraglutide were associated with significantly higher rates of biliary disorders, including gallbladder and gallstone problems, compared to other drugs in the database.

He, Long et al.·Frontiers in pharmacology·2025·
RPEP-113332025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Among 2,215 biliary adverse event reports, 1,709 involved GLP-1 RAs and 506 involved DPP-4 inhibitors. Key reporting odds ratios:

- Semaglutide: ROR 4.06 (95% CI 3.76–4.39) for biliary disorders

- Liraglutide: ROR 3.88 (95% CI 3.50–4.29)

- DPP-4 inhibitors overall: ROR 3.09 (95% CI 2.83–3.37)

- Sitagliptin specifically: ROR 3.46 (95% CI 3.13–3.83)

Both semaglutide and liraglutide showed significant associations with gallbladder disorders, gallstone disorders, and infectious biliary disorders. Liraglutide, alogliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin were also linked to biliary malignant tumors. DPP-4 inhibitors had a higher proportion of serious outcomes (76.88%) compared to GLP-1 RAs (51.55%).

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Researchers extracted adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between Q1 2013 and Q1 2024 using OpenVigil 2.1. They used four standard signal detection methods (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM) to assess whether biliary adverse events were reported more frequently than expected for these drug classes.

Why This Research Matters

With tens of millions of people now taking GLP-1 receptor agonists, even rare adverse effects can affect large numbers of patients. This analysis raises a safety signal that gallbladder and biliary problems may be more common with semaglutide and liraglutide than previously appreciated, warranting clinical awareness.

The Bigger Picture

Gallbladder problems have been an emerging concern with GLP-1 receptor agonists, potentially related to rapid weight loss or direct effects on gallbladder motility. This pharmacovigilance study adds quantitative evidence from real-world data, joining clinical trial observations that have noted elevated cholecystitis and cholelithiasis rates with these drugs.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

FAERS data has well-known limitations: it relies on voluntary reporting (under-reporting is common), cannot establish causation, may be influenced by reporting biases (e.g., higher awareness of GLP-1 RA side effects drives more reports), and lacks denominators to calculate true incidence rates. Confounders like obesity itself (a gallstone risk factor) and rapid weight loss cannot be controlled for in this analysis.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Should patients starting semaglutide or liraglutide receive baseline gallbladder screening, especially those with existing risk factors?
  • ?Is the biliary risk driven by rapid weight loss, direct GLP-1 receptor effects on the gallbladder, or both?
  • ?How do these biliary risks compare to the cardiovascular and metabolic benefits when evaluating overall risk-benefit?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
ROR 4.06 Semaglutide's reporting odds ratio for biliary disorders in 11 years of FDA adverse event data
Evidence Grade:
This is a pharmacovigilance analysis using FDA adverse event reporting data. While it uses rigorous signal detection methods, FAERS data cannot establish causation, calculate true incidence rates, or control for confounders. It generates safety signals that warrant further investigation.
Study Age:
Published in 2025 in Frontiers in Pharmacology, this analysis covers 11 years of FAERS data through Q1 2024, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date safety signal assessment.
Original Title:
Association between GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors with biliary disorders: pharmacovigilance analysis.
Published In:
Frontiers in pharmacology, 16, 1509561 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-11333

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I be worried about gallbladder problems on semaglutide?

This study found higher-than-expected reports of biliary issues with semaglutide, but it cannot tell us how common these problems truly are. The overall risk is likely still relatively low. If you experience persistent upper abdominal pain, nausea, or jaundice while on semaglutide, contact your healthcare provider.

What is a Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR)?

An ROR compares how often a particular side effect is reported for a specific drug versus all other drugs in the database. A semaglutide ROR of 4.06 means biliary disorders were reported about 4 times more often than expected, relative to other medications. However, this doesn't mean the drug causes the problem — it's a signal that warrants further investigation.

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-11333·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-11333

APA

He, Long; Li, Jinwei; Cheng, Xiong; Luo, Li; Huang, Yilan. (2025). Association between GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors with biliary disorders: pharmacovigilance analysis.. Frontiers in pharmacology, 16, 1509561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1509561

MLA

He, Long, et al. "Association between GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors with biliary disorders: pharmacovigilance analysis.." Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1509561

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Association between GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors with bili..." RPEP-11333. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/he-2025-association-between-glp1-ras

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.