Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

RPEP-042122019RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Published In:
American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 76(21), 1739-1748 (2019)
Database ID:
RPEP-04212

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-04212·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-04212

APA

Guyton, Justinne; Jeon, Michelle; Brooks, Amie. (2019). Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes mellitus.. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 76(21), 1739-1748. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz179

MLA

Guyton, Justinne, et al. "Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes mellitus.." American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz179

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes..." RPEP-04212. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/guyton-2019-glucagonlike-peptide-1-receptor

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.