Evaluation of the efficacy of a biomimetic peptide solution for rejuvenation of donor scalp and as storage media for hair follicle grafts during FUE hair transplantation.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Key Numbers
How They Did This
Why This Research Matters
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Trust & Context
- Original Title:
- Evaluation of the efficacy of a biomimetic peptide solution for rejuvenation of donor scalp and as storage media for hair follicle grafts during FUE hair transplantation.
- Published In:
- Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology, 27(3), 64-70 (2025)
- Database ID:
- RPEP-11135
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkPeptides
Related articles coming soon.
Cite This Study
https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-11135APA
Gold, Michael; Zaman, Ungku Mohd Shahrin Mohd; Chouksey, Vinay; Gosavi, Mahesh. (2025). Evaluation of the efficacy of a biomimetic peptide solution for rejuvenation of donor scalp and as storage media for hair follicle grafts during FUE hair transplantation.. Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology, 27(3), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2025.2468499
MLA
Gold, Michael, et al. "Evaluation of the efficacy of a biomimetic peptide solution for rejuvenation of donor scalp and as storage media for hair follicle grafts during FUE hair transplantation.." Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2025.2468499
RethinkPeptides
RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Evaluation of the efficacy of a biomimetic peptide solution ..." RPEP-11135. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/gold-2025-evaluation-of-the-efficacy
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.