Review synthesizes evidence on SGLT2i, GLP-1 RAs, dual and triple incretin agonists as comprehensive pharmacological strategies for the intertwined epidemics of diabetes and obesity.
Full toolkit reviewedFrom SGLT2i to triple agonists: comprehensive coverage of current and emerging diabesity pharmacotherapy
What the researchers found
SGLT2i, GLP-1 RAs, and emerging dual/triple agonists offer complementary mechanisms for diabesity management, with clinical evidence supporting progressive pharmacological intensification.
Why it matters
Diabesity affects hundreds of millions globally. Understanding the full pharmacological toolkit enables optimal treatment selection and combination strategies.
How the study worked
Comprehensive narrative review of clinical evidence for SGLT2i, GLP-1 RAs, and multi-receptor agonists in diabesity management.
What this study cannot tell us
Broad review may lack depth on individual drugs. Rapidly evolving field means some information may be superseded quickly.
How to read the evidence
Narrative review synthesizing clinical trial evidence across multiple drug classes.
When this study was published
Published in 2025.
The bigger picture
The diabesity drug landscape is evolving rapidly from single-target to multi-target peptide therapies, with each generation offering greater efficacy.
Questions still open
- What is the optimal sequencing of these drug classes?
- Should all diabesity patients receive multi-receptor agonists?
- How do cost and access affect real-world treatment decisions?
Common questions
What is diabesity?
Which drug class is best for diabesity?
Read the original research
Pharmacological Management of Diabesity: Current and Emerging Therapies.
Current obesity reports, 15(1), 5
Citation
Galasso, Martina; Caporusso, Mariangela; Volatile, Alessandra; Verde, Ludovica; Esposito, Katherine; Giorgino, Francesco; Perrini, Sebastio; Colao, Annamaria; Barrea, Luigi; Muscogiuri, Giovanna. (2026). Pharmacological Management of Diabesity: Current and Emerging Therapies.. Current obesity reports, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-025-00681-5