A comparative protease stability study of synthetic macrocyclic peptides that mimic two endocrine hormones.

Ferrie, John J et al.·Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters·2013·
RPEP-021662013RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
A comparative protease stability study of synthetic macrocyclic peptides that mimic two endocrine hormones.
Published In:
Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 23(4), 989-95 (2013)
Database ID:
RPEP-02166

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-02166·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-02166

APA

Ferrie, John J; Gruskos, Jessica J; Goldwaser, Ari L; Decker, Megan E; Guarracino, Danielle A. (2013). A comparative protease stability study of synthetic macrocyclic peptides that mimic two endocrine hormones.. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 23(4), 989-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.12.041

MLA

Ferrie, John J, et al. "A comparative protease stability study of synthetic macrocyclic peptides that mimic two endocrine hormones.." Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.12.041

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "A comparative protease stability study of synthetic macrocyc..." RPEP-02166. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/ferrie-2013-a-comparative-protease-stability

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.