Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.

Federspiel, Jan Michael et al.·International journal of legal medicine·2025·
RPEP-109182025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Why This Research Matters

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Trust & Context

Original Title:
Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.
Published In:
International journal of legal medicine, 139(5), 2577-2591 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-10918

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-10918·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-10918

APA

Federspiel, Jan Michael; Kettner, Mattias; Potente, Stefan; Heinbuch, Sara; Lux, Constantin; Verhoff, Marcel A; Ramsthaler, Frank. (2025). Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.. International journal of legal medicine, 139(5), 2577-2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03517-y

MLA

Federspiel, Jan Michael, et al. "Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.." International journal of legal medicine, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03517-y

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as p..." RPEP-10918. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/federspiel-2025-assessment-of-cardiac-biomarker

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.