FAERS Data Shows GLP-1 Drug Skin Reactions Are Less Common Than DPP-4 Inhibitor Skin Reactions

GLP-1 RA cutaneous adverse events (up to 8.16% of cases) were proportionally less common than DPP-4 inhibitor skin reactions (PRR 0.27), with semaglutide having the highest rate and dulaglutide the lowest.

Fat, Marisa N et al.·Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD·2026·
RPEP-151552026RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Cutaneous AEs reported in up to 8.16% of GLP-1 RA cases; semaglutide highest rate, dulaglutide lowest. PRR 0.27 vs DPP-4 inhibitors indicates proportionally fewer skin events. Exenatide showed increased odds (OR 5.01).

Key Numbers

How They Did This

Analysis of FDA FAERS data (2018-2024) for semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, and dulaglutide, with PRR calculation using DPP-4 inhibitors as comparator and logistic regression for predictors.

Why This Research Matters

Skin reactions can affect treatment adherence. Knowing which GLP-1 drugs have better dermatologic profiles helps guide prescribing decisions, especially as indications expand beyond diabetes.

The Bigger Picture

The overall lower skin reaction rate compared to DPP-4 inhibitors is reassuring as GLP-1 drugs expand to new indications including inflammatory skin conditions.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

FAERS has inherent reporting biases. Cannot determine causation. Underreporting likely. Denominator (total prescriptions) not available for true incidence calculation.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Why does exenatide have higher skin event odds than other GLP-1 drugs?
  • ?Should patients with pre-existing skin conditions prefer specific GLP-1 agents?
  • ?Do the immunomodulatory properties of GLP-1 drugs actually protect against some skin reactions?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
PRR 0.27 GLP-1 drugs had proportionally 73% fewer skin adverse events compared to DPP-4 inhibitors
Evidence Grade:
Large pharmacovigilance database analysis. Useful for signal detection but limited by FAERS reporting biases.
Study Age:
Published in 2025 using 2018-2024 FAERS data.
Original Title:
Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A FAERS Database Analysis From 2018-2024.
Published In:
Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 25(1), 11-16 (2026)
Database ID:
RPEP-15155

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Do GLP-1 drugs cause skin problems?

Skin reactions are reported in up to 8% of cases, including rash, itching, and hives. However, GLP-1 drugs actually have proportionally fewer skin reactions than DPP-4 inhibitors (another diabetes drug class).

Which GLP-1 drug is safest for skin?

Dulaglutide had the lowest rate of skin reactions, while semaglutide had the highest. Exenatide was an outlier with significantly higher odds of skin events.

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-15155·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-15155

APA

Fat, Marisa N; Johnson, Hayden C; Farberg, Aaron S. (2026). Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A FAERS Database Analysis From 2018-2024.. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 25(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.9448

MLA

Fat, Marisa N, et al. "Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A FAERS Database Analysis From 2018-2024.." Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2026. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.9448

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agon..." RPEP-15155. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/fat-2026-cutaneous-adverse-events-associated

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.