Comparing Liraglutide, Semaglutide, and Dulaglutide in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes: Which GLP-1 Drug Performs Best?

All three GLP-1 receptor agonists showed similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in veterans with type 2 diabetes, though liraglutide was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to dulaglutide.

Derington, Catherine G et al.·JAMA network open·2025·
RPEP-106982025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Not classified
Evidence
Not graded
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

In this large comparative effectiveness study of 21,790 veterans with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide showed no significant differences in kidney failure or cardiovascular outcomes. Kidney failure hazard ratios were similar across all comparisons (e.g., liraglutide vs semaglutide HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60–1.44), and the composite cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcome and major adverse cardiovascular events were also comparable.

The most notable finding involved all-cause mortality. Liraglutide was associated with a 31% lower hazard of death compared to dulaglutide in intent-to-treat analysis (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.83) and a 50% lower hazard in per-protocol analysis (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.82). Liraglutide also showed a trend toward lower mortality versus semaglutide (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99), though this lost statistical significance in per-protocol models. For gastrointestinal side effects, dulaglutide was associated with lower risk of gallstones (HR 0.72) and acute cholecystitis (HR 0.62) compared to semaglutide.

Key Numbers

How They Did This

This was a comparative effectiveness study using a target trial-emulation design, linking national data from the VA health system, Medicare, and the US Renal Data System. Researchers identified veterans with type 2 diabetes who were new users of liraglutide, semaglutide, or dulaglutide between 2018 and 2021, all of whom were already on metformin and did not have end-stage kidney disease. They used weighted Cox regression models to compare outcomes including kidney failure, cardiovascular events, death, and gastrointestinal adverse events through March 2023.

Why This Research Matters

GLP-1 receptor agonists have become a cornerstone of type 2 diabetes treatment, but most evidence comes from placebo-controlled trials rather than head-to-head comparisons. Clinicians and patients need to know whether one GLP-1RA offers meaningful advantages over another. This large real-world study provides reassurance that the three most commonly used GLP-1RAs are broadly comparable for heart and kidney protection, while flagging potential mortality differences that warrant confirmation in randomized trials.

The Bigger Picture

As GLP-1 receptor agonists see rapidly expanding use for diabetes, obesity, and cardiorenal protection, understanding which agent to choose matters for individualized care. This study adds to a growing body of real-world evidence suggesting the class effect is largely consistent across agents for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. The mortality signal favoring liraglutide is intriguing but could reflect residual confounding in observational data — the authors themselves call for head-to-head randomized trials to settle the question.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

As an observational study, even with careful statistical adjustments, residual confounding cannot be ruled out — differences in why doctors prescribed one drug over another could influence outcomes. The study population was predominantly male veterans (91%), which limits generalizability to women and non-veteran populations. The mortality advantage for liraglutide lost significance in some per-protocol analyses, suggesting the finding may not be robust. Additionally, the study period (2018–2021) included the early COVID-19 pandemic, which may have affected outcomes in ways that are difficult to account for.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would a head-to-head randomized clinical trial confirm the mortality advantage seen with liraglutide over dulaglutide?
  • ?Do these findings hold in more diverse populations, including women and non-veteran groups?
  • ?What mechanisms might explain potential mortality differences between GLP-1RAs that share the same receptor target?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
31% lower mortality risk Veterans initiating liraglutide had a 31% lower hazard of all-cause death compared to those starting dulaglutide (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.83).
Evidence Grade:
This is a large, well-designed observational comparative effectiveness study using a target trial-emulation framework and linked national databases. While not a randomized controlled trial, the rigorous methodology, large sample size, and use of active comparators with new-user designs strengthen the evidence. However, observational design inherently limits causal conclusions.
Study Age:
Published in 2025, this is a very recent study using data through 2023. Its findings reflect current prescribing patterns and contemporary formulations of these three GLP-1RAs.
Original Title:
Liraglutide vs Semaglutide vs Dulaglutide in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.
Published In:
JAMA network open, 8(10), e2537297 (2025)
Database ID:
RPEP-10698

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide equally effective for heart and kidney protection?

According to this study, yes — all three GLP-1 receptor agonists showed similar rates of kidney failure, major cardiovascular events, and the combined cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcome in veterans with type 2 diabetes.

Should I switch from dulaglutide to liraglutide based on the mortality findings?

Not necessarily. While liraglutide showed a lower mortality risk compared to dulaglutide in this observational study, the authors caution that head-to-head randomized trials are needed to confirm this finding. Medication decisions should be made with your healthcare provider based on your individual circumstances.

Read More on RethinkPeptides

Related articles coming soon.

Cite This Study

RPEP-10698·https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-10698

APA

Derington, Catherine G; Sarwal, Amara; Wei, Guo; Hartsell, Sydney E; Throolin, Michael; Singh, Ravinder; Nevers, McKenna R; Zhang, Chong; Katkam, Niharika; Takyi, Augustine; Chakravartula, Akhil R; Babu, Poorvika; Deshmukh, Vikrant G; Boucher, Robert E; Drakos, Stavros G; Greene, Tom; Shen, Jincheng; Beddhu, Srinivasan. (2025). Liraglutide vs Semaglutide vs Dulaglutide in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.. JAMA network open, 8(10), e2537297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37297

MLA

Derington, Catherine G, et al. "Liraglutide vs Semaglutide vs Dulaglutide in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.." JAMA network open, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37297

RethinkPeptides

RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Liraglutide vs Semaglutide vs Dulaglutide in Veterans With T..." RPEP-10698. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/derington-2025-liraglutide-vs-semaglutide-vs

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.