Lanreotide Cut Neuroendocrine Tumor Progression Risk by 53% in Landmark CLARINET Trial
The CLARINET trial showed that monthly lanreotide injections cut disease progression risk by 53% in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, leading to FDA approval.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
In the landmark CLARINET trial, lanreotide (a long-acting somatostatin analog) cut the risk of tumor progression or death by 53% compared to placebo in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the gut and pancreas (hazard ratio 0.47, p<0.001). After 96 weeks, 65.1% of lanreotide patients had no disease progression compared to just 33.0% on placebo.
The median progression-free survival wasn't even reached in the lanreotide group (vs. 18 months for placebo), meaning more than half the patients were still progression-free at study end. The treatment effect was consistent across subgroups, and quality of life was similar between groups.
Key Numbers
n=204 · 96 weeks · HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.30–0.73) · p<0.001 · PFS at 24 months: 65.1% vs 33.0% · Median PFS: not reached vs 18.0 months · Diarrhea: 26% · Abdominal pain: 14%
How They Did This
Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial (CLARINET). 204 patients with well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, nonfunctioning, somatostatin receptor-positive, grade 1 or 2 (Ki-67 <10%) metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were randomized to lanreotide 120 mg or placebo injected every 28 days for 96 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival.
Why This Research Matters
CLARINET was the definitive trial that established lanreotide as a first-line antiproliferative treatment for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, directly leading to FDA approval. Before this study, somatostatin analogs were primarily used for symptom control; CLARINET proved they actually slow tumor growth. Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, this is one of the most important studies in neuroendocrine tumor treatment.
The Bigger Picture
CLARINET transformed the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors by proving that somatostatin analogs aren't just symptom management — they're actual anticancer therapy. Together with the earlier PROMID trial (which tested octreotide), it established somatostatin analogs as the foundation of neuroendocrine tumor treatment worldwide. This trial remains a cornerstone reference in oncology guidelines.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Only included grade 1/2 tumors (Ki-67 <10%) — results may not apply to more aggressive grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors. Only nonfunctioning tumors were included (those not producing excess hormones). Many patients had stable disease at entry, which could bias toward favorable outcomes. The study did not demonstrate an overall survival benefit.
Questions This Raises
- ?Does lanreotide provide an overall survival benefit in addition to delaying progression?
- ?Would lanreotide be effective in higher-grade (grade 3) neuroendocrine tumors or functioning tumors?
- ?How does lanreotide compare to newer peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as first-line treatment?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 53% risk reduction (HR 0.47) Lanreotide cut the risk of disease progression or death nearly in half compared to placebo in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor patients over 96 weeks
- Evidence Grade:
- This is strong-grade evidence from a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The trial was well-designed with a meaningful clinical endpoint and led directly to regulatory approval.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2014, CLARINET remains the definitive trial for lanreotide in neuroendocrine tumors and continues to guide clinical practice worldwide. Its findings have been reinforced by subsequent long-term follow-up data.
- Original Title:
- Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
- Published In:
- The New England journal of medicine, 371(3), 224-33 (2014)
- Authors:
- Caplin, Martyn E, Pavel, Marianne(2), Ruszniewski, Philippe
- Database ID:
- RPEP-02347
Evidence Hierarchy
Frequently Asked Questions
What is lanreotide and how does it treat cancer?
Lanreotide is a synthetic version of somatostatin, a natural hormone that tells cells to stop growing and dividing. Neuroendocrine tumor cells have receptors for somatostatin, so lanreotide binds to these receptors and slows tumor growth. It's given as a monthly injection and is one of the first-line treatments for slow-growing neuroendocrine tumors.
Is lanreotide a cure for neuroendocrine tumors?
No — lanreotide slows tumor growth but doesn't cure the cancer. In this trial, it kept tumors stable significantly longer than placebo (most patients still hadn't progressed after 2 years). It's typically used as long-term treatment to control disease progression, often in combination with other approaches for more advanced cases.
Read More on RethinkPeptides
Cite This Study
https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/RPEP-02347APA
Caplin, Martyn E; Pavel, Marianne; Cwikla, Jaroslaw B; Phan, Alexandria T; Raderer, Markus; Sedlackova, Eva; Cadiot, Guillaume; Wolin, Edward M; Capdevila, Jaume; Wall, Lucy; Rindi, Guido; Langley, Alison; Martinez, Santiago; Blumberg, Jochen; Ruszniewski, Philippe; CLARINET Investigators. (2014). Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.. The New England journal of medicine, 371(3), 224-33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1316158
MLA
Caplin, Martyn E, et al. "Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.." The New England journal of medicine, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1316158
RethinkPeptides
RethinkPeptides Research Database. "Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tum..." RPEP-02347. Retrieved from https://rethinkpeptides.com/research/caplin-2014-lanreotide-in-metastatic-enteropancreatic
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkPeptides research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.