rethinkPeptides Search
Menu
Study breakdown

GLP-2 Peptide Modified with Cell-Penetrating Sequences Delivered Nose-to-Brain Shows Antidepressant Effect

AnimalModerate evidence
The takeaway

PAS-CPP-modified GLP-2 achieved nose-to-brain delivery with antidepressant effects within 20 minutes of intranasal administration at the same dose effective via direct brain injection, while intravenous delivery was ineffective.

20 minutes

onset of antidepressant effect from intranasal PAS-CPP-GLP-2, matching direct brain injection efficacy

What the researchers found

PAS-CPP-GLP-2 showed antidepressant-like effects within 20 min of intranasal administration at the same dose effective by i.c.v. injection, while i.v. delivery was ineffective. The modification prevented degradation and enabled transcellular nose-to-brain transport.

Why it matters

Depression affects hundreds of millions of people, and treatment-resistant depression has few options. A nasal spray delivering an effective brain peptide within minutes could transform treatment — especially since GLP-2 works in treatment-resistant models where conventional antidepressants fail.

The numbers in context

CPPs significantly enhanced nasal GLP-2 brain delivery; antidepressant effects in both depression and treatment-resistant depression models.

How the study worked

In vitro: cellular uptake mechanism (macropinocytosis via CPP), endosomal escape (via PAS), and transcellular transport studies. In vivo: depression model mice tested with intranasal, intravenous, and intracerebroventricular PAS-CPP-GLP-2 administration.

Who was studied

Depression and treatment-resistant depression model mice

What this study cannot tell us

Mouse depression model — behavioral tests are proxies for human depression. Dose-response optimization and long-term efficacy not established. PAS-CPP modification adds manufacturing complexity. Safety profile of repeated intranasal delivery needs evaluation.

How to read the evidence

Innovative proof-of-concept with compelling evidence of nose-to-brain delivery (intranasal effective, IV ineffective). Mouse depression model is standard but limited in predicting human outcomes.

When this study was published

Published in 2021. Nose-to-brain peptide delivery for psychiatric conditions is an emerging field.

The bigger picture

Nose-to-brain delivery is one of the most promising routes for CNS drug delivery, bypassing the blood-brain barrier. This proof-of-concept with GLP-2 demonstrates that CPP/PAS modification can make neuropeptides clinically viable as nasal therapies for brain disorders.

Questions still open

  • Can PAS-CPP-GLP-2 nasal spray be advanced to human clinical trials for depression?
  • Would this nose-to-brain delivery approach work for other neuropeptides?
  • How does the antidepressant effect compare to rapid-acting treatments like ketamine?

Common questions

How does a nasal spray deliver drugs to the brain?
The nose has a direct connection to the brain through olfactory nerves. Specially designed peptides can travel along these nerve pathways, bypassing the blood-brain barrier and reaching the brain within minutes.
What is treatment-resistant depression?
Depression that doesn't respond to standard antidepressants, affecting about one-third of depression patients. GLP-2 showed effects in treatment-resistant depression models, suggesting it works through different mechanisms than conventional drugs.

Read the original research

Usefulness of cell-penetrating peptides and penetration accelerating sequence for nose-to-brain delivery of glucagon-like peptide-2.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 335, 575-583

Citation

Akita, Tomomi; Kimura, Ryosuke; Akaguma, Saki; Nagai, Mio; Nakao, Yusuke; Tsugane, Mamiko; Suzuki, Hiroaki; Oka, Jun-Ichiro; Yamashita, Chikamasa. (2021). Usefulness of cell-penetrating peptides and penetration accelerating sequence for nose-to-brain delivery of glucagon-like peptide-2.. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 335, 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.007